This site has a private, invite-only VIP review forum where a select few post and discuss reviews out of public view.
So why should everyone else keep writing detailed reviews in public—creating value, traffic, and credibility, exposing yourself and personal details out to the world while a small group gets a private platform ?
That creates a two-tier system: public contributors and hidden insiders. It’s less transparent, less fair, and a strong disincentive for regular users to contribute.
At that point, public reviewers are just unpaid content generators for a platform that clearly values private voices more.
Until reviews are treated consistently and openly, I don’t see a good reason for the rest of us to keep posting here. If feedback is going to be segmented and selectively hidden, it’s better shared elsewhere—or not at all.
So why should everyone else keep writing detailed reviews in public—creating value, traffic, and credibility, exposing yourself and personal details out to the world while a small group gets a private platform ?
That creates a two-tier system: public contributors and hidden insiders. It’s less transparent, less fair, and a strong disincentive for regular users to contribute.
At that point, public reviewers are just unpaid content generators for a platform that clearly values private voices more.
Until reviews are treated consistently and openly, I don’t see a good reason for the rest of us to keep posting here. If feedback is going to be segmented and selectively hidden, it’s better shared elsewhere—or not at all.
