Competence Porn

[Notanother]

Read about a new TV trend. Watching people who are good at their jobs that it brings a sense of relief to those watching. Like medical, crime dramas etc

My query is. If people don’t gatekeep please

Most competent SW they’ve seen recently ie last month. That way there’s a chance other punters can experience.
I suggest Icy at DB. Asian SW. late thirties at minimum ,but good body and keeps going. No chat or rest unless YOU ask for it. Good reviews.

If you extend time factor I’d also suggest Camilla at DH.

There’s gotta be more out there. Ones who actually are consistently good. Note haven’t mentioned ones like Ari, Willow, Matilda Watts , Lanlan etc as it’s been a while but others have reviewed positively.

 

[Banana]

Read about a new TV trend. Watching people who are good at their jobs that it brings a sense of relief to those watching. Like medical, crime dramas etc

My query is. If people don’t gatekeep please

Most competent SW they’ve seen recently ie last month. That way there’s a chance other punters can experience.
I suggest Icy at DB. Asian SW. late thirties at minimum ,but good body and keeps going. No chat or rest unless YOU ask for it. Good reviews.

If you extend time factor I’d also suggest Camilla at DH.

There’s gotta be more out there. Ones who actually are consistently good. Note haven’t mentioned ones like Ari, Willow, Matilda Watts , Lanlan etc as it’s been a while but others have reviewed positively.

Sounds great!

But my rule is if I share one I get to gatekeep one. You do the maths lol

Ulitmately I don't think it's gatekeeping per se as most punters probably value discretion and privacy, and you have some people that will go straight to "hey welcome to PH alt SW account xxx lol" when someone new posted a somewhat positive review of said SW, further discourage others to post. I am probably the best example of this but I solidered on lol

DM is where it's at.

 

[Notanother]

Everyone has there own rules about reviews whether gatekeeping or unicorns. Fair enough if the Sw requests no review etc.
But there’s a lot of SW out there. There’s also a lot of mediocre ones. They join the industry to make money. Good ones should be rewarded with punter patronage. Bad ones will leave as there’s no money. The standard will only rise if punters reward the good ones with visits.

 

[Banana]

Everyone has there own rules about reviews whether gatekeeping or unicorns. Fair enough if the Sw requests no review etc.
But there’s a lot of SW out there. There’s also a lot of mediocre ones. They join the industry to make money. Good ones should be rewarded with punter patronage. Bad ones will leave as there’s no money. The standard will only rise if punters reward the good ones with visits.

100% agree!

Good girls should be rewarded for their effort and bad girls should be called out as the most basic thing a consumer can do to ensure consistent level of service across the industry, the other one is call "vote with your wallet".

But again the sex industry has some special caveats around this so don't tend to play by that same open market rules.

Some of it we created ourselves due to the inherently hidden nature of the sex industry plus when horny no man think logically

 

[Notanother]

100% agree!

Good girls should be rewarded for their effort and bad girls should be called out as the most basic thing a consumer can do to ensure consistent level of service across the industry, the other one is call "vote with your wallet".

But again the sex industry has some special caveats around this so don't tend to play by that same open market rules.

Some of it we created ourselves due to the inherently hidden nature of the sex industry plus when horny no man think logically

Ancient punter saying.

“Man with two heads is no wiser “

 

[gingerbread]

100% agree!

Good girls should be rewarded for their effort and bad girls should be called out as the most basic thing a consumer can do to ensure consistent level of service across the industry, the other one is call "vote with your wallet".

But again the sex industry has some special caveats around this so don't tend to play by that same open market rules.

Some of it we created ourselves due to the inherently hidden nature of the sex industry plus when horny no man think logically

Except good and bad can be very subjective in some aspects.

Other things (like chatting to girl in the next room while you are busy - it's happened) are just bad full stop.

And everyone's lines to be crossed land at slightly different places.

 

[reamer]

Sometimes it's not gate keeping but just lazy

 

[Banana]

Except good and bad can be very subjective in some aspects.

Other things (like chatting to girl in the next room while you are busy - it's happened) are just bad full stop.

And everyone's lines to be crossed land at slightly different places.

Reviews of any product/service are always subjective, if we simply put facts only write up then it will just be a spec sheet.

But you are right there are still some universally agreed standards we punters all instinctively know that separate the good ones from the bad ones. I think the majority of punters are looking for that in a review.

 

[Notanother]

Most punters would agree. GFE is more than light kissing. Dams should be advertised as required or not for DATY on ads. There’ll be many other opinions though.