Competition - Question

Can a review be written about a sex worker who is no longer active, or must all reviews be about current/active providers ?
Thanks

Yeah sure you can write it about a retired sex worker. You never know they might come out of retirement!

How can you be sure it's not some fictional SWer someone writes about? Anyone could say they're retired or their ad was up last month but she's not now. They could make up some crazy shit. Just wanting to know how you'd weed out the pretenders from the legitimate reviewers.

Also another thing. How do you weed out AI reviews? So far I'm not seeing anything that looks AI generated, but someone could use AI to review a girl, even one they've seen. As a writer who uses Chat GPT as a text editor for my more professional stuff (to make sure I'm using good grammar and trim down wordiness), you get to know the tell tale signs. Certain quirks. Are there administrators on this site who will be able to weed those out? Or are you relying on members to point it out?

It may never be an issue on a site like this. But just wondering.

Detecting AI reviews is probably the easiest part, it's pretty easy to see which ones are written by AI. You can even use AI detection tools to detect if a piece of writing has been written with AI. We are fine if people just use AI like ChatGPT or Grammarly to improve the writing of their legit reviews.

I also think it's pretty easy to tell the legit reviews from the fake ones. After reading a lot of reviews people can get a hang of determining which are real or now, as people did on SexForum.

But don't worry, we will do everything we can to ensure the competition is fair and honest. May the best reviews win!

Meester Bond said:

How can you be sure it's not some fictional SWer someone writes about? Anyone could say they're retired or their ad was up last month but she's not now. They could make up some crazy shit. Just wanting to know how you'd weed out the pretenders from the legitimate reviewers.

Click to expand...

definitely not. I am not going to invent a Jane Doe whom nobody has ever heard of. I have a few in mind. One finished working last year or early this year, and there is another who works under the radar, but all of them are well known in the community.

I guess the other problem is reviewing a girl that's no longer active who people won't have a clue who you're talking about. I'm making sure the girls I review are ones who are well known, from agencies, or been around for a while, like Sarah Peach.

I've held back writing reviews for Bella Davis, Ruby Reign, and Lucy Adams since I'd seen them ages ago and all have retired but maybe I will just to increase my chances of winning

Meester Bond said:

I guess the other problem is reviewing a girl that's no longer active who people won't have a clue who you're talking about. I'm making sure the girls I review are ones who are well known, from agencies, or been around for a while, like Sarah Peach.

Click to expand...

No problems. I have already published my 2 reviews. One for a SM lady who rarely publishes her ad but she is active...the other became inactive around January this year, but it's well known in the community.